|
|
|
|
Memo
The National Children's agenda is an opportunity to develop a policy framework and plan of action to implement a set of services to children, youth and their families across Canada. The purpose of this memo is to outline the developments associated with the National Children's Agenda, and to identify a role for Halton in supporting an agenda that meets the needs of children and their families. HistoryIn February 1999 the results of important negotiations between the Government of Canada and the Provincial and Territorial Governments led to an agreement, A Framework to Improve the Social Union for Canadians (1999). This Agreement is based upon mutual respect between orders of government and a willingness to work more closely together to meet the needs of Canadians. The Agreement contains: guiding principles for social policy; commitments to ensure social programs support the mobility of Canadians; commitments to strengthen government accountability to citizens; collaborative practices between governments on social programs; federal commitments on the use of its spending power; and a process for solving disputes between governments.1 It is a mechanism to development a national agenda to protect the national dimensions for social policy and undertake the reforms necessary to enhance the effectiveness of social programs in Canada. In December 1997, Canada's First Ministers asked the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Council of Ministers on Social Policy Renewal to engage the public in developing, within the Framework Agreement, a vision for enhancing the well being of Canada's children. In an effort to move forward the Council recognized that a national agenda for children requires a shared vision and a common understanding of children's changing circumstances and needs, both as children and as future adults. Two documents were released to facilitate debate and discussion. They are2 :
These studies informed a community consultation which took place during the spring of 1999, culminating in the June 2000 release of the consultation document, Public Dialogue on the National Children's Agenda-Developing a Shared Vision. National non-governmental organizations (NGOs) submitted briefs and held forums across Canada attempting to influence the deliberations of the Council of Ministers on Social Policy Renewal. The intricacies, posturing and squabbling inherent in intergovernmental relations has not made input easy and in the not-for-profit sector has often led to cynicism, submission depression and consultation fatigue. In an attempt to create public awareness around the elaboration of a National Children's Agenda and to pressure all levels of government, a number of coalitions concerned with the health and well being of children highlighted the issues of and advocated for the National Children's Agenda. They include the following groups 3 :
These organizations have documented the need for a national framework guiding the development of a range of services that reflect the complexity of family life and the diversity of the communities in which families live. They have addressed issues of scope - what services are included, accessibility, equity, adequacy, entitlement - universal vs. target, delivery system - normative or stigmatizing. These coalitions have pushed in the area of long-term federal/provincial investments that would lead to long-term sustainable programs. They have monitored the progress and set backs in the long path of putting in place a National Children's Agenda. What is the National Children's Agenda?5The National Children's Agenda represents a commitment of our federal, provincial and territorial governments to act to ensure that all Canada's children have the best possible opportunity to develop to their full potential as healthy, successful and contributing members of society. The National Children's Agenda, when fully elaborated, will act as a far-reaching, long-term action plan for coordinating and advancing actions in a wide range of children's issues. The vision, values and goals of the National Children's Agenda are: A) Our Vision: What do we, as a society, want for our children?
B) Our Values: What do we, as a society, believe about our children?
C) Our Goals: What do we hope to achieve?The following goals incorporate knowledge we have about influences on child development. They are directed by the National Children's Agenda's vision for children and the values this vision embodies. The goals are focused on four measurable areas: health; safety and security; success at learning; and social engagement and responsibility. We can track our progress in achieving these goals by measuring and reporting on key indicators and influences on children's lives. As a nation, we aspire to have children who are:
All provinces, with the exception of Quebec, have signed the Social Union Framework Agreement and the National Children's Agenda.6 Some of the programs that are considered part of the National Children's Agenda are7 :
Community Concerns related to the National Children's AgendaNational associations, grass roots community organizations and broad coalitions raise important issues associated with the attributes of the programs that fall under the National Children's Agenda. The most salient concerns are:
Why are we in Halton interested in advancing a National Children's Agenda?A collective window of opportunity exists to influence governments at all levels to implement a full National Children's Agenda within the principles of the Social Union Framework which recognizes the equality of all Canadians and the need to treat all with equity and fairness. This would create the circumstance for the development of an adequate and integrated continuum of services in local communities. This would contribute to the work of the not-for-profit sector as they affect positively the lives of children and youth in our community. What can we do in Halton to support the National Children's Agenda?
Endnotes1 The Social Union Framework Agreement (SUFA) allows 6 provinces to define the conditions of a fiscal framework for new federal funding. It no longer requires that the 6 provinces represent a majority of people in Canada, therefore, Ontario and Alberta are not essential in putting forward serious proposals. It recognizes that conditioned grants from the federal government to the provinces have enabled the introduction of new and innovative social programs and to ensure that they are available to all Canadians. The Agreement states: " The use of the federal spending power under the constitution has been essential to the development of Canada's social union." (p.3). Also, from the vantage point of community, the Social Union Framework Agreement establishes the importance of promoting the full and active participation of all Canadians in Canada's social and economic life and to work in partnership with individuals, families, communities, voluntary organizations, business and labour, and ensure appropriate opportunities for Canadians to have meaningful input into social policies and programs." (p. 1). The Social Union Framework Agreement can be found on the web at http://www.socialunion.gc.ca 2 These documents can be found on the website: http://www.socialunion.gc.ca 3 See Appendix 1 for a membership list of Campaign 2000 and the National Children's Alliance.4 The Halton Social Planning Council is a member of Campaign 2000. As part of our participation in Campaign 2000, we produce the Halton Report Card on Child Poverty. 5 This section quotes the vision, values and goals directly from, Public Dialogue on National Children's Agenda-Developing A Shared Vision, Section vi, pp. 1-3. 6 Quebec agrees in principle with the vision, values and goals of the National Children's Agenda. 7 Analyses exist related to the limitation of these programs and the terms guiding their implementation. It is not the purview of this memo to discuss these programs. For example, see "The New Canada Child Tax Benefit," Community Dispatch. December 1998, Vol.3 No.2 Moreover, extended parental leave under EI was not a negotiated benefit as it falls within the federal government's jurisdiction. 8 On September 11, 2000 the First Ministers announced unanimously an agreement to make young children a national priority. The Early Childhood Development Services initiative is a $2.2 billion investment over 5 years to expand early childhood development services in four key action areas: i) promoting healthy pregnancy, birth and infancy; ii) improving parenting and family supports; iii) strengthening early childhood development, learning and care; and iv) strengthening community supports. A comprehensive early childhood development services program is long overdue but as presented there is no guarantee that the provinces will develop programs in all four areas. The Agreement fails to encourage the development of a comprehensive coherent system serving children and youth. There is no requirement that provinces spend additional dollars. Funding is not adequate. 9 Municipalities deliver 90 % of the services. 10 Community groups and not-for-profit agencies within provinces such as Ontario and Alberta raise the concern that a grant that is not conditional may be diverted or invested in other areas rather than the building of a continuum of services needed for children and youth. 11 Visit the Sign on for Canada's Kids website: www.signonforcanadaskids.org 12 In 1997 Quebec introduced a universal childcare program that offers parents up to 10 hours of childcare per day for a cost of $5. This program is for children from birth to four years old and in many cases includes children from 5 to 12 years of age. British Columbia will follow Quebec's example in January 2001 implementing a similar childcare program for children 5 to 12 years of age. It will cost $7 per day.
|
|
Send mail to the
Webmaster with
questions or comments about this web site.
|